Nº. 1 of  2

FUCK YEAH LAPIDUS!

Our Frank who art in airplanes, hallowed be thy name. Thy chopper come, thy will be done on Island as it is on the set of a Burt Reynolds movie. Give us this day our daily beard, and forgive us our weirdest damn funerals, as we forgive those who aren't going to Guam, are they? and lead us not into talking about bacon, but deliver us with duct tape.

Amen.

Posts tagged suntipede:

Lost re-watch | 5x9 | Namaste

(via rousseaus)

(Source: regularpeople)

It's been too long since LOST.

sister: <Remembering when Frank & Sun went off to find Jin.>
me: Did they have a ship name?
sister: 'Fun?'
me: 'Frun.'
sister: 'Sank.'
me: I don't think that's a good name for a ship.
sister: haha
me: 'Frunk?' How about something with 'Lapidus?'
sister: There's too many syllables to go with Sun. 'Fun' is the best.

(Source: gifshows)

(via zorabioz)

Official Lost Podcast: April 9, 2009

CARLTON CUSE: I have one burning question about this episode. Were Lapidus and Sun shacking up in DHARMAville?
DAMON LINDELOF: That's a great question, 'cause when—when Ben enters, Lapidus sort of emerges from another room with his shirt half unbuttoned...
CARLTON CUSE: ...pretending like, "Oh, I was in the other room, I wasn't basically, y'know..."
DAMON LINDELOF: Right...
CARLTON CUSE: "..doing whatever with Sun."
DAMON LINDELOF: I'm gonna say no. Lapidus and Sun like each other just as friends.
CARLTON CUSE: I'm gonna say yes. I'm gonna say they secretly, uh, were shacking up.
DAMON LINDELOF: Okay, well, that's an interesting, and... and, uh... well, let's just leave it at interesting—
CARLTON CUSE: Let's leave it at—
DAMON LINDELOF: —theory. But as far as burning questions go, I think that Ben basically—
CARLTON CUSE: I'm sorry, there's a burning question better than that one?
I noticed that the subtitles, at least on Netflix, have a lot of typos. The first one is a simple enough error, but the one in the fourth panel here? Inexcusable.

I noticed that the subtitles, at least on Netflix, have a lot of typos. The first one is a simple enough error, but the one in the fourth panel here? Inexcusable.

Nº. 1 of  2